ShrimpPriceIndex

← All insights

The Bulk Discount, Measured: What Pack Size Does to Per-Shrimp Price

Singles, 5-packs, 10+1s, 25-packs — the same shrimp at very different per-animal prices. We measured the pack-size curve across every listing we track.

Published July 29, 2026 · figures recomputed from data through November 10, 2026 · by Shrimp Price Index

This site exists because sticker prices can't be compared across pack structures — a $33 "10+1" pack and a $6 single are different answers to "what does this shrimp cost?" Every listing we track is normalized to a per-shrimp price first (how). That normalization also lets us measure something buyers feel but rarely see quantified: exactly what buying in bulk does to the per-animal price.

The pack-size curve

Pack size In-stock listings Median per-shrimp price
Single animal 22 $9.00
2–5 pack 108 $5.99
6–12 pack 154 $5.00
13–24 pack 128 $4.40
25+ pack 49 $4.40

As of November 10, 2026, the median single animal costs $9.00 while the median per-shrimp price in a 25+ pack is $4.40. Most of the discount arrives by the 6–12 pack tier; beyond ~25 animals the curve flattens. Note this table compares the whole market's singles against the whole market's packs — expensive collector morphs sell as singles more often, which steepens the raw curve. The like-for-like comparison is below.

Same morph, single vs. pack

The clean measurement: morphs where the same store shelf offers both a single animal and a 10+ pack today. Median premium for buying one at a time, across the 5 morphs where both exist: 19%.

Morph Single, per shrimp 10+ pack, per shrimp Single premium
Fancy Tiger Shrimp $11.00 $6.21 +77%
Blue Bolt Shrimp $9.00 $6.40 +41%
Amano Shrimp $7.50 $6.30 +19%
Galaxy Shrimp $14.50 $13.33 +9%
Golden Calceo Shrimp $9.00 $17.87 -50%

When the single is still the right buy

Method and limits

Pack counts are read from each listing's own text ("10+1", "Pack of 25", bonus animals included); listings whose animal count can't be verified are excluded from per-shrimp statistics rather than guessed. Today's figures cover 594 in-stock listings across 7 vendors; the like-for-like table requires both cohorts at the same time, so it's a smaller, honest sample rather than a model.

Method, in one line: every figure above is computed from our daily snapshots of the complete public catalogs of the vendors we track — nothing is estimated, surveyed, or quoted from other sites. Details in the methodology. Spotted something that looks wrong? Tell us and we'll check it against the underlying snapshots.

Related reading